from Canada writes: There was wealthy to be an referendum this be overthrown whether Harper called it or not. There indeed is little contest in this. Dion was hoping to be borne the coattails of Obama to victory. Why does he deem that is possible? The US Democratic Party are further dexter than the Canadian Conservative Party which currently sits steadfastly astride the state center. An earlier notice suggested that Harper will not be able to deal with an Obama government. What a weight of crap.
Obama and Harper have more in frequent than Obama and Dion. Dion is a socialist, and Obama is absolutley not. Obama, or McCain for that quantity will use well with Harper. In Obama's speach in Denver he said that his object was to wean the US from "MIDEAST OIL" over the next decade. (no connection to all Canadian oil).
It was also leaked in the despatch a week or so ago that should he win, one of Obama's victory orders of question is to round Canada to prevent in Afghanistan. I aspect advance to the choice campaign, the debates, the media reporting, and mostly the crushing of the Liberal Party of Toronto. Oh yeah, it is only pulchritudinous that in a minority government, immobile voting dates are inconsequential.
Why should it be that it is only beside the point disapproval parties that can control the life/fate of a parliament? Sounds kinda undemocratic to me!
With respect to post: click
No comments:
Post a Comment